The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11190 | 2020-08-23 15:37:47 | 86.76 | 96% |
| 3472 | 2017-06-09 11:04:25 | 77.94 | 96% |
| 1723 | 2017-04-01 17:30:14 | 70.09 | 88% |
| 1328 | 2017-03-16 11:47:03 | 71.54 | 87% |
| 956 | 2017-02-18 18:35:34 | 71.42 | 90% |
| 855 | 2017-02-08 16:30:24 | 71.18 | 87% |