The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
46641 | 2018-02-08 02:31:05 | 170.35 | 99% |
37490 | 2017-11-30 04:11:45 | 152.00 | 98% |
33061 | 2017-10-31 02:55:25 | 149.01 | 97% |
29076 | 2017-10-14 00:46:45 | 118.37 | 97% |
25609 | 2017-10-01 03:39:56 | 95.60 | 96% |
23526 | 2017-09-26 01:56:28 | 151.79 | 99% |
22955 | 2017-09-21 20:53:52 | 130.72 | 98% |
13818 | 2017-09-14 11:14:17 | 123.74 | 97% |