The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 44013 | 2019-10-05 22:59:49 | 135.27 | 99% |
| 30954 | 2018-10-25 07:27:21 | 111.90 | 97% |
| 23570 | 2018-02-19 23:40:02 | 120.80 | 98% |
| 22573 | 2017-08-03 13:03:32 | 108.14 | 98% |
| 19061 | 2017-05-28 12:16:17 | 118.26 | 96% |
| 18389 | 2017-05-01 15:04:03 | 104.73 | 94% |
| 15899 | 2017-03-11 04:46:56 | 90.76 | 92% |
| 12892 | 2017-02-11 14:33:53 | 100.07 | 93% |
| 12792 | 2017-02-11 10:07:24 | 95.25 | 90% |
| 11088 | 2017-01-26 22:53:29 | 90.25 | 91% |
| 10781 | 2017-01-22 16:43:05 | 90.50 | 91% |
| 10163 | 2017-01-19 18:40:41 | 95.12 | 95% |