The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16894 | 2019-04-05 04:41:53 | 109.69 | 99% |
| 14921 | 2019-01-14 01:33:33 | 102.47 | 99% |
| 9758 | 2017-07-01 03:30:22 | 96.71 | 99% |
| 9569 | 2017-06-28 03:23:39 | 103.62 | 99% |
| 7854 | 2017-04-04 18:26:28 | 97.84 | 97% |
| 7770 | 2017-04-02 23:04:28 | 100.39 | 98% |
| 7227 | 2017-02-28 01:21:33 | 97.94 | 98% |