The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 106593 | 2019-06-05 06:50:43 | 165.35 | 99% |
| 106592 | 2019-06-05 06:32:36 | 145.69 | 97% |
| 104939 | 2018-03-11 18:30:16 | 140.63 | 98% |
| 104938 | 2018-03-11 17:57:30 | 133.44 | 97% |
| 104917 | 2018-03-09 21:35:05 | 132.91 | 98% |
| 96810 | 2017-04-01 20:37:24 | 131.16 | 95% |
| 95308 | 2017-01-18 14:16:49 | 107.30 | 92% |