The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
48647 | 2019-03-02 22:26:45 | 100.24 | 97% |
47469 | 2019-02-16 11:02:12 | 107.28 | 98% |
46086 | 2019-01-27 22:03:10 | 108.12 | 98% |
35379 | 2018-07-24 19:57:55 | 91.76 | 97% |
31691 | 2018-04-25 22:41:04 | 106.08 | 98% |
31082 | 2018-04-10 05:10:07 | 103.04 | 97% |
26487 | 2017-12-14 03:46:40 | 104.49 | 98% |
23611 | 2017-10-02 02:21:43 | 108.91 | 99% |
19145 | 2017-06-28 06:52:22 | 96.07 | 98% |
17746 | 2017-05-26 03:17:28 | 103.20 | 96% |
16609 | 2017-05-03 22:00:17 | 99.15 | 98% |
12805 | 2017-02-06 08:22:22 | 95.87 | 98% |