The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
45330 | 2019-11-01 04:49:34 | 84.66 | 97% |
43858 | 2019-09-11 06:15:59 | 90.96 | 98% |
32855 | 2018-12-25 20:15:17 | 83.10 | 98% |
30674 | 2018-12-19 11:46:57 | 106.63 | 98% |
26779 | 2018-12-08 16:54:25 | 104.36 | 98% |
25336 | 2018-11-20 01:44:39 | 83.79 | 98% |
21123 | 2018-10-07 12:10:30 | 105.17 | 97% |
19128 | 2018-09-04 17:13:52 | 77.01 | 98% |
7849 | 2018-02-08 00:22:13 | 59.99 | 97% |
7724 | 2018-02-06 01:37:14 | 67.83 | 98% |