The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
38168 | 2020-08-02 12:53:21 | 142.31 | 98% |
34306 | 2020-02-06 20:43:10 | 153.70 | 99% |
27306 | 2019-07-16 15:40:23 | 146.29 | 99% |
15538 | 2019-03-03 12:19:16 | 141.46 | 99% |
13950 | 2019-02-21 11:04:24 | 131.03 | 98% |
13478 | 2019-02-07 13:21:40 | 155.53 | 99% |
4792 | 2018-11-10 02:35:14 | 129.27 | 98% |
4120 | 2018-10-26 13:26:35 | 126.97 | 98% |
3172 | 2018-10-14 10:46:46 | 138.34 | 99% |
580 | 2018-04-05 11:20:18 | 136.82 | 99% |