The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21363 | 2018-03-12 00:11:51 | 76.56 | 99% |
| 18679 | 2018-02-21 05:08:31 | 72.65 | 98% |
| 17632 | 2018-02-18 00:47:49 | 72.09 | 98% |
| 15811 | 2018-01-08 10:52:59 | 76.00 | 99% |
| 13964 | 2017-08-13 08:55:18 | 74.66 | 99% |
| 12572 | 2017-06-20 12:28:46 | 72.93 | 98% |
| 12193 | 2017-05-25 07:08:50 | 72.61 | 97% |
| 12074 | 2017-05-24 08:52:48 | 64.16 | 96% |
| 11757 | 2017-05-23 07:39:49 | 70.24 | 96% |
| 10693 | 2017-05-21 06:37:47 | 63.90 | 96% |
| 7010 | 2017-02-27 08:37:18 | 62.75 | 98% |
| 6613 | 2017-02-24 05:17:18 | 62.34 | 97% |
| 6419 | 2017-02-23 09:17:31 | 60.41 | 97% |
| 5988 | 2017-02-19 08:46:18 | 56.87 | 95% |
| 3442 | 2017-02-01 03:10:36 | 58.51 | 97% |