The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
29677 | 2019-12-31 19:16:04 | 97.36 | 97% |
29362 | 2019-12-09 19:20:18 | 89.91 | 97% |
29196 | 2019-12-02 22:53:09 | 88.07 | 96% |
29009 | 2019-11-25 21:04:23 | 108.75 | 98% |
28811 | 2019-11-13 21:56:17 | 97.68 | 97% |
28309 | 2019-10-15 20:19:25 | 99.96 | 98% |
27683 | 2019-09-10 21:50:38 | 107.72 | 99% |
25883 | 2019-03-26 15:57:56 | 91.60 | 98% |
24542 | 2018-10-22 16:50:59 | 101.41 | 99% |
22023 | 2018-07-25 16:50:39 | 84.34 | 97% |
15906 | 2017-06-06 18:07:11 | 84.87 | 98% |