The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
32024 | 2018-09-28 13:34:26 | 134.00 | 99% |
26323 | 2017-09-27 18:21:14 | 133.13 | 99% |
24758 | 2017-08-16 18:28:38 | 131.41 | 99% |
24352 | 2017-07-26 17:34:34 | 128.84 | 98% |
23059 | 2017-06-27 12:29:15 | 136.73 | 99% |
22759 | 2017-06-22 17:29:39 | 136.99 | 98% |
21732 | 2017-05-30 20:43:54 | 137.23 | 98% |
19599 | 2017-05-01 15:25:57 | 141.78 | 99% |
16011 | 2017-01-20 15:02:13 | 121.26 | 95% |