The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42633 | 2020-11-03 09:08:44 | 93.63 | 98% |
| 39659 | 2020-09-29 15:02:46 | 104.41 | 99% |
| 37975 | 2020-09-01 12:08:20 | 86.90 | 96% |
| 34143 | 2020-05-25 13:45:52 | 87.59 | 98% |
| 33330 | 2020-05-10 16:33:55 | 90.59 | 98% |
| 32151 | 2020-04-17 13:29:55 | 92.08 | 98% |
| 27680 | 2020-02-06 09:30:17 | 101.52 | 98% |
| 15526 | 2019-06-19 10:46:55 | 72.98 | 98% |
| 14185 | 2019-05-25 17:18:50 | 95.47 | 98% |
| 5474 | 2019-02-16 08:22:37 | 84.28 | 98% |