The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36963 | 2020-07-27 21:00:06 | 146.79 | 98% |
| 28912 | 2019-07-07 20:50:36 | 129.64 | 98% |
| 28250 | 2019-06-30 14:28:01 | 115.67 | 97% |
| 24200 | 2019-05-15 16:30:18 | 128.21 | 98% |
| 21724 | 2019-03-27 19:26:34 | 119.95 | 98% |
| 15180 | 2019-01-04 19:35:00 | 95.74 | 97% |
| 2781 | 2018-09-04 19:17:49 | 57.26 | 94% |
| 2672 | 2018-09-03 19:34:04 | 57.74 | 94% |
| 1032 | 2018-08-04 14:06:50 | 47.08 | 94% |